Search found 39 matches

by jimhelios
Sun Mar 21, 2021 3:35 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: ESP32, Mongoose OS and W25N01 VFS Driver trouble
Replies: 1
Views: 2441

Re: ESP32, Mongoose OS and W25N01 VFS Driver trouble

I'm willing to pay someone to help if they can.
by jimhelios
Thu Mar 18, 2021 2:32 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: ESP32, Mongoose OS and W25N01 VFS Driver trouble
Replies: 1
Views: 2441

ESP32, Mongoose OS and W25N01 VFS Driver trouble

This post is about a problem with Mongoose OS, and I hope it's acceptable to post it here. There is a separate forum for Arduino, but not Mongoose. I have asked for assistance on their forum, and on Stack Overflow, but no luck. I realize this issue is probably more about Mongoose than the ESP32, but...
by jimhelios
Thu Mar 18, 2021 2:10 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: ESP32-WROOM-32
Replies: 2
Views: 3120

Re: ESP32-WROOM-32

Well that board does have the antenna on the module.

I assume that you made triple sure you entered your router's SSID and password correctly? Is there a space in the SSID?
by jimhelios
Tue Mar 02, 2021 6:26 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Maximum external flash size for ESP32
Replies: 3
Views: 3453

Re: Maximum external flash size for ESP32

Oh that's great thank you. I just ordered some Winbond 1Gb SPI chips to test with.
by jimhelios
Mon Mar 01, 2021 10:00 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Maximum external flash size for ESP32
Replies: 3
Views: 3453

Maximum external flash size for ESP32

Hi All...

I want to make sure I read the ESP32 data sheet correctly. Did it say that it can have up to four external flash chips, but none can be bigger than 16 Megabytes?
by jimhelios
Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:27 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Bluetooth / BLE licensing/qualification process for esp32
Replies: 5
Views: 4602

Re: Bluetooth / BLE licensing/qualification process for esp32

Where are you selling it? I'm going through this now. If you use the BLE features of the ESP32, then your device is an "intentional radiator." So in the US you would need FCC approval, in Canada it's DOC and, God forbid, in the EU and Japan it's CE. On the plus side, depending upon what you did with...
by jimhelios
Thu Aug 27, 2020 9:50 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Enter/exit CAN reset mode
Replies: 19
Views: 22380

Re: Enter/exit CAN reset mode

Sorry if its not appropriate to bump an old thread, but I'm having similar issues. I'm suing an ole CAN driver, not from ESP-IDF. After a soft reset of my ESP32, the CAN controller would give bad data and this was fixed by resetting the CAN module as recommended earlier in this thread. However, the ...
by jimhelios
Sun Aug 23, 2020 11:14 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Is it possible to have data corruption just after a soft restart?
Replies: 20
Views: 15482

Re: Is it possible to have data corruption just after a soft restart?

Mongoose offers as far as the OTA, the config system, the timers, network protocol drivers and so on. IDF has all that. Mongoose gives you cross platform of course. Otherwise similar feature sets. I think they moved to IDF 3.3-R5 a week ago, or it least it looks that way in GitHub Not enough :( The...
by jimhelios
Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:59 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Is it possible to have data corruption just after a soft restart?
Replies: 20
Views: 15482

Re: Is it possible to have data corruption just after a soft restart?

ATM your problem seems to be support under Mongoose. I wonder why you use mongoose? The only add I can see is the MQTT server yet you loose CAN (or gain painful CAN)? Well I'm using much of what Mongoose offers as far as the OTA, the config system, the timers, network protocol drivers and so on. I ...
by jimhelios
Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:15 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Is it possible to have data corruption just after a soft restart?
Replies: 20
Views: 15482

Re: Is it possible to have data corruption just after a soft restart?

I would kick mongoose & especially if you paid. A driver which screws up on overflow is really not a driver (IMHO). I would go on but ... Actually I will. IMHO you cannot claim driver support with something which locks 'fail' on overflow. You could claim 'comming soon' etc. So I would kick against ...