Search found 3 matches
- Mon Jan 03, 2022 10:27 pm
- Forum: ESP-AT
- Topic: Migrating from SiLabs/BlueGiga BGAPI - Questions on AT firmware
- Replies: 5
- Views: 23311
Re: Migrating from SiLabs/BlueGiga BGAPI - Questions on AT firmware
Hello, I don't quite understand what you mean. Could you describe the problem in detail?
For AT communicate over SPI, you can refer to https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-at/en/latest/Compile_and_Develop/How_to_implement_SPI_AT.html.
Hi,
Maybe it would be best if I explained how it works ...
- Fri Oct 22, 2021 5:19 pm
- Forum: ESP-AT
- Topic: Migrating from SiLabs/BlueGiga BGAPI - Questions on AT firmware
- Replies: 5
- Views: 23311
Re: Migrating from SiLabs/BlueGiga BGAPI - Questions on AT firmware
If I'm understanding this right, the SPI interface just provides a transport for the same AT command set and responses. In my particular case it would be worse than the UART interface - just as difficult to parse, probably harder to set up DMA for, and since I've only got one SPI interface available ...
- Wed Oct 20, 2021 3:06 am
- Forum: ESP-AT
- Topic: Migrating from SiLabs/BlueGiga BGAPI - Questions on AT firmware
- Replies: 5
- Views: 23311
Migrating from SiLabs/BlueGiga BGAPI - Questions on AT firmware
tl;dr: Is there a binary equivalent of the AT command set? By which I mean one that doesn't use plain ASCII text but rather a consistent binary format?
I've been using the SiLabs WGM110 for years. It was derived from the BlueGiga WF121 and uses the same binary BGAPI interface. I'd looked at the ...
I've been using the SiLabs WGM110 for years. It was derived from the BlueGiga WF121 and uses the same binary BGAPI interface. I'd looked at the ...