I share the same feeling, but as I said - it is in my system PATH (also - your s3 project compiles successfully on my machine), therefore I feel something fishy going on under the esp-idf cmake hood (that somehow gets rid of my PATH)...
I just thought that you might encountered the same problem so ...
Search found 7 matches
- Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:03 am
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
- Replies: 80
- Views: 127981
- Sun Jan 06, 2019 2:10 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
- Replies: 80
- Views: 127981
Re: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
Hi permal,
I have successfully built your g3 project and I am trying to adjust mine project layout and cmakes according to your, however I get this odd behavior:
[mchodzikiewicz@raczek:build|feature/bsp]$ cmake -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=/home/mchodzikiewicz/CLionProjects/beerbob_fw_esp32/openbrewery ...
I have successfully built your g3 project and I am trying to adjust mine project layout and cmakes according to your, however I get this odd behavior:
[mchodzikiewicz@raczek:build|feature/bsp]$ cmake -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=/home/mchodzikiewicz/CLionProjects/beerbob_fw_esp32/openbrewery ...
- Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:01 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
- Replies: 80
- Views: 127981
Re: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
Hi,
Bumping topic up:
Could you possibly relate to this (probably) last major issue?
Bumping topic up:
Could you possibly relate to this (probably) last major issue?
- Sun Dec 09, 2018 11:39 am
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
- Replies: 80
- Views: 127981
Re: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
Nice! I took a look into your repo - it looks like we have very similar goal (yet I have approached it slightly different) maybe we could merge some of our work in the future.
Anyway - Angus, could you please advice which way should we go? I am ready to get involved in the process a bit more, and ...
Anyway - Angus, could you please advice which way should we go? I am ready to get involved in the process a bit more, and ...
- Sat Dec 08, 2018 11:30 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
- Replies: 80
- Views: 127981
Re: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
Hi!
I am very happy with the direction you took - it is possible to use esp-idf as a library and use other CMake-managed libraries with ease, but my prefered use case is a bit more advanced:
I want to wrap esp-idf with my own abstraction layer (or in other words, implement my cross-platform ...
I am very happy with the direction you took - it is possible to use esp-idf as a library and use other CMake-managed libraries with ease, but my prefered use case is a bit more advanced:
I want to wrap esp-idf with my own abstraction layer (or in other words, implement my cross-platform ...
- Wed Nov 28, 2018 6:05 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
- Replies: 80
- Views: 127981
Re: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
Hi!
Thank you for the updated build system, however - I do experience some issues:
Using almost exactly your example:
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.5)
project(idf_as_lib C)
# The source file main.c contains app_main() definition
add_executable(${CMAKE_PROJECT_NAME}.elf application.h ...
Thank you for the updated build system, however - I do experience some issues:
Using almost exactly your example:
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.5)
project(idf_as_lib C)
# The source file main.c contains app_main() definition
add_executable(${CMAKE_PROJECT_NAME}.elf application.h ...
- Tue Nov 27, 2018 8:48 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
- Replies: 80
- Views: 127981
Re: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
Hi Angus, is the branch you mentioned publicly available? It would be great if I could switch right now, since I am blocked by this PR (I do not want to do hacks that ain't gonna be needed soon)