Search found 22 matches
- Mon Jul 08, 2019 4:16 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Isolating Application Code to APP Core
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3366
Re: Isolating Application Code to APP Core
Hello WiFive, Thanks for the links, but I have already perused those posts. Both of those authors are referencing a desire to implement designs which seek to disable interrupts on the APP core. I am seeking to take control of the interrupts on the APP core within bare metal application code and segr...
- Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:09 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Isolating Application Code to APP Core
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3366
Re: Isolating Application Code to APP Core
If i didn't read your post to fast your looking for something like this. I believe you read my post too quickly. Your reference is an example of how to pin tasks to cores. I am looking to restrict the FreeRTOS and stack operation to the PRO core (cpu0) while giving the application-specific code fre...
- Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:02 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Isolating Application Code to APP Core
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3366
Isolating Application Code to APP Core
Hello All, I am new to the ESP32 and attempting to learn as much as I can as fast as I can. I am attempting to architect a design which will utilize the PRO core for supporting the WiFi and BLE stacks with the FreeRTOS while utilizing the APP core to execute my application-specific code (bare metal)...
- Mon Jul 01, 2019 7:04 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: ESP32 Bare Metal Implementation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3437
Re: ESP32 Bare Metal Implementation
Thanks for the reply, Peter... We have dual core 160MHz+ to achieve what we did 10 years ago with 20Mhz. But we create the application a lot quicker I think (I would stand by the toolset being a lot cheaper). I would agree in part with your statement... provided the user has a good understanding of ...
- Wed Jun 26, 2019 5:43 pm
- Forum: Hardware
- Topic: External Interrupt Latency
- Replies: 14
- Views: 16211
Re: External Interrupt Latency
I think there has been a little bit of progress, although not specifically for this purpose: the GPIO drivers have been optimized a bit so if you use the ESP-IDF API, your interrupt latency should be a bit lower (but not as low as using the bare metal), and ESP-IDF now allows you to have high-prio ...
- Wed Jun 26, 2019 12:53 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: ESP32 Bare Metal Implementation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3437
Re: ESP32 Bare Metal Implementation
There have been some threads about it but I have not seen an example that I would use Thanks for the feedback... unfortunately, I am experiencing the same issue finding any worth while details through the forum and the documentation. This is not something unique to Espressif. Too many of the manufa...
- Wed Jun 26, 2019 12:46 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: ESP32 Bare Metal Implementation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3437
Re: ESP32 Bare Metal Implementation
Why? I am told that app_main() runs from the startup task (what ever that is) but if you don't create any more tasks is the one task the same as no tasks? Or if you only have one task is that a task? There are several reasons for operating under bare metal... the two crucial details for me on this ...
- Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:03 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: ESP32 Bare Metal Implementation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3437
ESP32 Bare Metal Implementation
Hello all, I am attempting to create a project in which the APP core is running "bare metal" code (no RTOS). I have been informed that this should be possible, while the PRO core executes the WiFi / BLE stack code running under FreeRTOS. To this point, I have not found any examples of a "bare metal"...
- Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:58 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Eclipse front-end and CMake Questions
- Replies: 0
- Views: 852
Eclipse front-end and CMake Questions
Hello All, I am interested in developing within the Eclipse environment and I would like to utilize the CMake build process since it is becoming the defacto standard. I have a few questions about executing projects with this combination... 1) I have been developing my first project which built upon ...
- Fri May 31, 2019 2:49 pm
- Forum: ESP IoT Solution
- Topic: Dual Core Implementations
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3174
Re: Dual Core Implementations
Thank you for the clarifications!
If I elect to utilize the SDIO slave interface, can that be connected to the host controller's SPI peripheral without an issue, or are there any issues with protocol?
Regards,
Mark
If I elect to utilize the SDIO slave interface, can that be connected to the host controller's SPI peripheral without an issue, or are there any issues with protocol?
Regards,
Mark