Search found 384 matches
- Sun Jun 02, 2019 8:53 am
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
- Replies: 80
- Views: 104051
Re: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
Ok, I've reproduced the problem using a minimal project based off the official IDF-examples and filed an issue for it.
- Sat Jun 01, 2019 11:12 am
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
- Replies: 80
- Views: 104051
Re: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
idf_build_component, that seems to work. However, I'm now stuck in a situation that I think we were in when the CMake build system first was introduced - the final executable/elf isn't linked against the pre-built libraries shipped with IDF (such as libnet80211.a). I can't remember what was done abo...
- Fri May 31, 2019 9:17 am
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
- Replies: 80
- Views: 104051
- Fri May 31, 2019 7:16 am
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
- Replies: 80
- Views: 104051
Re: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
Angus, My project can be found here . The master branch currently does not build with the latest IDF, you'll have to go back to before the last CMake changes, some two weeks back. On the branch feature/31-update-to-idf-master I think I've now gotten as far as to get IDF to build (including lwip), bu...
- Thu May 30, 2019 6:42 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
- Replies: 80
- Views: 104051
Re: Compatibility between "normal CMake" and ESP-IDF
Any response to this? Trying to update to latest IDF, but the seemingly deprecated IDF_EXTRA_COMPONENT_DIRS (now named EXTRA_COMPONENT_DIRS) is preventing me from doing so. How are components supposed to be added now? I have a component that adds some items to resulting sdkconfig.h so that menuconfi...
- Wed May 29, 2019 10:15 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Memory corruption / IDF heap corruption detection vs GCC Address Sanitizer
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9345
Re: Memory corruption / IDF heap corruption detection vs GCC Address Sanitizer
That is much sooner than I dared hope for. Thank you.ESP_Sprite wrote: ↑Wed May 29, 2019 12:42 amI'm hoping we can release at least something for everyone to test with in the next week.
- Tue May 28, 2019 11:33 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Memory corruption / IDF heap corruption detection vs GCC Address Sanitizer
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9345
Re: Memory corruption / IDF heap corruption detection vs GCC Address Sanitizer
There are two issues I know of. Half of it is this one , the other half has something to do with the ESP32 cache getting confused if there's 16/8-bit and 32-bit loads/stores done to the same cache line. I'm planning to fix them both with a toolchain update; as soon as that's ready you can see if th...
- Tue May 28, 2019 6:22 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Memory corruption / IDF heap corruption detection vs GCC Address Sanitizer
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9345
Re: Memory corruption / IDF heap corruption detection vs GCC Address Sanitizer
Had it running during the night for 12h with PSRAM enabled, still only a single connection, no corruption detected. It's an elusive bug.
ESP_Sprite, can you give some information on the status and nature of the bug you refer to?
ESP_Sprite, can you give some information on the status and nature of the bug you refer to?
- Tue May 28, 2019 6:20 am
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: TLS handshake slow ?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 10927
Re: TLS handshake slow ?
You're right. My code had a call to create a task for this. Setting other priority values on that task, and not pinning it to one core, reduces the response time to 3s. Still a lot longer than the report I referred to... Any clues on how to make this better ? I can't seem to find useful values for ...
- Sun May 26, 2019 8:42 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Memory corruption / IDF heap corruption detection vs GCC Address Sanitizer
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9345
Re: Memory corruption / IDF heap corruption detection vs GCC Address Sanitizer
Update before heading off to bed: 12h stable.