SEGGER SystemView via UART in IDF v5.0

NickJames
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun May 26, 2019 5:53 am

SEGGER SystemView via UART in IDF v5.0

Postby NickJames » Wed Jun 22, 2022 8:16 am

I used SystemView in IDF v4.4, managing to pull a trace via JTAG using openocd as described in the documentation: (https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp ... nd-options). openocd and gdb were flaky and capturing traces was troublesome. I was intrigued to see that the UART transport has been added to app_trace in IDF v5.0. This is my experience trying to use it:

Setup:
Development Kit: None
Module or chip used (2):
- ESP32-C3
-- TX/RX pins tried: (14,13), (13,14), (8,9), (9,8)
- ESP32-WROOM-32
-- TX/Rx pins tried: (12,13)
IDF version (run git describe --tags to find it): v5.0-dev-3424-gbb23d783c0
Build System: idf.py
Compiler version (run xtensa-esp32-elf-gcc --version to find it):
riscv32-esp-elf-gcc (crosstool-NG esp-2022r1-RC1) 11.2.0
Operating System: Linux
SEGGER SystemView Version: V3.32
Program: examples/get-started/hello_world

Selecting Target->Start Recording in SEGGER SystemView sends some data on the UART1 (seen with oscilloscope) but the ESP32 doesn't respond. I've confirmed that UART1 is physically connected correctly by redirecting console logs to it (after first disabling Application Level Tracing).

I've tried a few different baud rates and pin combinations. Has anyone used Application Level Tracing over UART successfully?

Relevant sdkconfig:

Code: sdkconfig Select all


#
# Application Level Tracing
#
# CONFIG_APPTRACE_DEST_JTAG is not set
CONFIG_APPTRACE_DEST_NONE=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_DEST_UART=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_DEST_UART_NOUSB=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_DEST_UART1=y
# CONFIG_APPTRACE_DEST_UART2 is not set
# CONFIG_APPTRACE_DEST_UART_NONE is not set
CONFIG_APPTRACE_UART_TX_GPIO=12
CONFIG_APPTRACE_UART_RX_GPIO=13
CONFIG_APPTRACE_UART_BAUDRATE=460800
CONFIG_APPTRACE_UART_RX_BUFF_SIZE=128
CONFIG_APPTRACE_UART_TX_BUFF_SIZE=4096
CONFIG_APPTRACE_UART_TX_MSG_SIZE=128
CONFIG_APPTRACE_UART_TASK_PRIO=1
CONFIG_APPTRACE_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_ONPANIC_HOST_FLUSH_TMO=-1
CONFIG_APPTRACE_POSTMORTEM_FLUSH_THRESH=0

#
# FreeRTOS SystemView Tracing
#
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_DEST_UART=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_DEST_CPU_0=y
# CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_DEST_CPU_1 is not set
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_TS_SOURCE_GPTIMER=y
# CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_TS_SOURCE_ESP_TIMER is not set
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_MAX_TASKS=16
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_BUF_WAIT_TMO=500
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_EVT_OVERFLOW_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_EVT_ISR_ENTER_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_EVT_ISR_EXIT_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_EVT_ISR_TO_SCHED_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_EVT_TASK_START_EXEC_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_EVT_TASK_STOP_EXEC_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_EVT_TASK_START_READY_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_EVT_TASK_STOP_READY_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_EVT_TASK_CREATE_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_EVT_TASK_TERMINATE_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_EVT_IDLE_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_EVT_TIMER_ENTER_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_APPTRACE_SV_EVT_TIMER_EXIT_ENABLE=y
# end of FreeRTOS SystemView Tracing
# end of Application Level Tracing

Dmitry
Espressif staff
Espressif staff
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 4:58 am

Re: SEGGER SystemView via UART in IDF v5.0

Postby Dmitry » Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:47 am

Hi @NickJames,

It looks like the problem related to system view module and how it work on esp32c3. With Esp32/Esp32s2/Esp32s3 it works fine.
I will try to fix it this/next week, and inform you.

Thank you for report.

Regards,
Dmitry

soliis
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2025 6:51 pm

Re: SEGGER SystemView via UART in IDF v5.0

Postby soliis » Tue Nov 18, 2025 6:55 pm

I know this is an old post but I am running into a very similar issue also with the esp32c3. I would really like to get real time tracing with systemview working, but the documentation is a little sparse. One potentially difference in my setup from OP is that my device is only connected via USB, but I would expect that the USB_CDC UART would also be acceptable for this as it is an option in the menuconfig. I'm currently using ESP-IDF v5.3.2.

Has there been any update to this?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bytespider, Google [Bot] and 7 guests