Re: WRover-Kit Attach to Ubuntu 16.04LTS VirtualBox
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 7:06 pm
Wow!!! That is some serious diagnostic work and congrats on your skills for solving it. The lessons I come away with:
1. Assume nothing (i.e. that the board is working perfectly)
2. Buy 2 (or ideally 3) of everything and check that if A fails B and C also fail (or not)
3. Eliminate as many unknowns as possible (which is what you did by recreating down to the nth degree a working environment)
I'm very spooked by the story. If there was indeed an assembly issue with the board, that would lower confidence in just about any ESP32 en-devour using this board. If something doesn't work, then we have the risk that it isn't usage but is actual hardware issue.
A data point ... I believe this is the very first time I have personally come across a story where it was the ESP32 board that was being claimed to be the issue. Every other time it had been software (95% of the time) or connected hardware (5% of the time).
However ... the great news is that you got it resolved. What would have been brilliant (and I'm assuming that you didn't do this) would have been some high resolution photos of the flaws you found. Maybe you can entice someone from the production side of these devkits to comment. If it were me, I'd ask you to put it aside and immediately send you a new one with postage return for the one you have. I'd want to look at the failing board in depth to see if there is some root cause or pattern that could be attributed to the problem. Since the silk screening was subtly different from mine, I'd also want to understand in depth the history of your board. Was it an early one, a later one or one produced by an identifiable source?
1. Assume nothing (i.e. that the board is working perfectly)
2. Buy 2 (or ideally 3) of everything and check that if A fails B and C also fail (or not)
3. Eliminate as many unknowns as possible (which is what you did by recreating down to the nth degree a working environment)
I'm very spooked by the story. If there was indeed an assembly issue with the board, that would lower confidence in just about any ESP32 en-devour using this board. If something doesn't work, then we have the risk that it isn't usage but is actual hardware issue.
A data point ... I believe this is the very first time I have personally come across a story where it was the ESP32 board that was being claimed to be the issue. Every other time it had been software (95% of the time) or connected hardware (5% of the time).
However ... the great news is that you got it resolved. What would have been brilliant (and I'm assuming that you didn't do this) would have been some high resolution photos of the flaws you found. Maybe you can entice someone from the production side of these devkits to comment. If it were me, I'd ask you to put it aside and immediately send you a new one with postage return for the one you have. I'd want to look at the failing board in depth to see if there is some root cause or pattern that could be attributed to the problem. Since the silk screening was subtly different from mine, I'd also want to understand in depth the history of your board. Was it an early one, a later one or one produced by an identifiable source?