ESP32C3 Custom Board
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2024 3:54 pm
My friend and I are developing a custom board for BT/Wifi using the ESP32C3 and an onboard antenna based off: [TI 2.4 GHz Antenna][/https://www.ti.com/lit/an/swra117d/swra117d.pdf].
In our first version, the BT/Wifi was not working properly. We used the tx test tone in the [ESP Certification and Test Tool][/https://www.espressif.com/en/support/do ... ools?keys=] to check the emitted signal and compared it to an official ESP dev kit: Marker 2 is our dev kit and Marker 3 is our board. We can see that there is not only a difference in power (not significant in this picture because we might have placed our board closer the receiver) but more importantly there is a difference in frequency at max power. I'd also add that we later changed the clc circuit on the antenna and the signal strenght greatly increased.
Occasionally if we stopped and restarted the test tone while the c3 was hot, the signal would reduce but be the right frequency...
Reading that this might be caused by problems with the oscillator or antenna circuits, we tried various CL values for both and managed to increase power somewhat however the frequency issue persisted... Could this be related to auto calibration by the ESP?
We have no VNA at our disposal unfortunately.
We have since also added the inductor L2 to oscillator, better separated oscillator and antenna signals and created a thicker ground place isolating the antenna:
The proximity to the antenna has also been optimized in our last version: Before we order the new boards, we were wondering if anyone had any insight on what our last error might have been?
Also, if 1mm thickness is sufficient for a 4 layer board? Lastly if the choice of antenna is significant as long as they have the same characteristics? (50 Ohm impedance at 2.4Ghz)
Thank you.
Jack
In our first version, the BT/Wifi was not working properly. We used the tx test tone in the [ESP Certification and Test Tool][/https://www.espressif.com/en/support/do ... ools?keys=] to check the emitted signal and compared it to an official ESP dev kit: Marker 2 is our dev kit and Marker 3 is our board. We can see that there is not only a difference in power (not significant in this picture because we might have placed our board closer the receiver) but more importantly there is a difference in frequency at max power. I'd also add that we later changed the clc circuit on the antenna and the signal strenght greatly increased.
Occasionally if we stopped and restarted the test tone while the c3 was hot, the signal would reduce but be the right frequency...
Reading that this might be caused by problems with the oscillator or antenna circuits, we tried various CL values for both and managed to increase power somewhat however the frequency issue persisted... Could this be related to auto calibration by the ESP?
We have no VNA at our disposal unfortunately.
We have since also added the inductor L2 to oscillator, better separated oscillator and antenna signals and created a thicker ground place isolating the antenna:
The proximity to the antenna has also been optimized in our last version: Before we order the new boards, we were wondering if anyone had any insight on what our last error might have been?
Also, if 1mm thickness is sufficient for a 4 layer board? Lastly if the choice of antenna is significant as long as they have the same characteristics? (50 Ohm impedance at 2.4Ghz)
Thank you.
Jack