ESP32 Forum

Posted: **Wed Jun 21, 2017 9:23 pm**

Status : Development

Just in time for "codename esp64"?

Posted: **Wed Jun 21, 2017 9:27 pm**

Status : Development
Just in time for "codename esp64"?

edit: ESP-PSRAM64

edit: ESP64 alias ESP32 - have psram64 inside! and is named new ESP64

#
bingo!

precaution, i edit with a smiley after the post, cause not shure

edit: again an edit
one possible more:
ESP64 has ESP32 inside and ESP-PSRAM32 inside - for codename ESP64

Posted: **Thu Jun 22, 2017 7:49 am**

: the_joke_of_2020.jpg (156.67 KiB) Viewed 13764 times

what we have all done in the past to get infos?

stand all here in this thread!
and all can read it.

- esp32.com
- john lee
- Finance & Board Secretary's Office | Espressif Systems
- interna
- externa

what we have get?
- Salami tactics
- misleading infos
- shematic without R9
- ...

And it is now slowly embarrassing.

@Jeroen
With all respect what I have to your software achievements.
you shoot beyond the edge now.

your posted shematic is wrong!

i understand you are Software guy - so please!
and do not recommend the world contacts
who can not and do not want to give information.
or into the misleading!
just finish the topic and it is good.

R9 has not been commented yet, neither confirmed nor revised.

honest`?
rarely laughed so much!

btw:

(And what’s with the external crypto engine, by the way? Did you encounter issues doing ECC/ECDSA on the ESP32 itself?)

I do not think that you are the right contact partner
Believe me - I know what I'm talking about!

And by the way
It is free to trust everyone to whom he has confidence.
Do you believe that with any false info the trust gets better?
Just in the IoT? P2P? M2M?
.....think over one moment .....

Posted: **Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:16 am**

Fair enough. Truth be told, I did not know you were from Olimex, and the things that were said in the blog post didn't lead me to beleve the people writing it were really active here (For example, they seem to have entirely skipped over the possibility to just use a Wrover module, which as far as I can see would be a way easier solution). Furthermore, the blogpost explicitely thanked you, looking like they got the information second-hand through you: I'd thought I'd just offer to shorten the lines and have them talk to Espressif directly.

Also, I'm honestly interested in the reason for the external crypto engine - I'm happily doing ECC and ECDSA on the ESP32 and haven't really found any issues with it. If there are issues causing you to disregard the built-in capabilities, I'd love to hear of them.

Posted: **Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:20 am**

..have them talk to Espressif directly.

this was done!
and we get not the info too

please -

Posted: **Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:21 am**

If there are issues causing you to disregard the built-in capabilities, I'd love to hear of them.

again -
you are not the right contact person for this jeroen.
believe me.

Posted: **Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:25 am**

If there are issues causing you to disregard the built-in capabilities, I'd love to hear of them.
again -
you are not the right contact person for this jeroen.
believe me.

Then I invite you to post it here anyway, not because of me, but for the benefit of other people who want to use the ECC/ECDSA capabilities in the ESP32. You seem to have a reason why you don't want to use it; methinks that reason can also be important to other people who are interested in the crypto capabilities of the ESP32.

Posted: **Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:28 am**

Which schematic is he talking about for swapped clk/cmd?

Posted: **Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:34 am**

I think the documentation for the esp-idf branch had it swapped initially. Not sure if there was a schematic that also has it swapped.

Posted: **Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:39 am**

... I did not know you were from Olimex

I'm not from Olimex.
It should not make any difference either.
I know from the pycom attitude,
That only the the service gets the paid for it.
it is OK
- espressif also has USD 1MIO in pycom as offshoot / invest
Invested or? Just let it be jeroen.
And the new chip they will also present soon.
So what is it?

We are waiting for the release of this week and it is good.
The topic psram, 1.8, noises and other, we have now on the table
And are through with it.

More I personally have to say on this subject no more,
honestly. I only get up when I try
To gloss over everything instead of revising it.

R9 is missing
(Unconfirmed)

CLK, CS can not share between flash and psram
(Unconfirmed, not edit in reference)

Sd card can not share the data lines with flash
(Confirmed)

ESP32 Forum

which new "esp" 8 pin ic is this on the new esp32 modul? ;-)

Re: which new "esp" 8 pin ic is this on the new esp32 modul? ;-)

Re: which new "esp" 8 pin ic is this on the new esp32 modul? ;-)

Re: which new "esp" 8 pin ic is this on the new esp32 modul? ;-)

Re: which new "esp" 8 pin ic is this on the new esp32 modul? ;-)

Re: which new "esp" 8 pin ic is this on the new esp32 modul? ;-)

Re: which new "esp" 8 pin ic is this on the new esp32 modul? ;-)

Re: which new "esp" 8 pin ic is this on the new esp32 modul? ;-)

Re: which new "esp" 8 pin ic is this on the new esp32 modul? ;-)

Re: which new "esp" 8 pin ic is this on the new esp32 modul? ;-)

Re: which new "esp" 8 pin ic is this on the new esp32 modul? ;-)