Hello,

I'm sorry, I haven't had time to reply here until now!

The attached image "Screenshot_3.png" shows the problem in the editor area.

I wanted to flash the app and my FAT partition from within the IDE via the connector "USB"/"JTAG" of the "ESP32S3 DevKitC-1" module, but it's not working. I ...

Hello,

It's true that ESP-IDF doesn't require this information, but Espressif-IDE, as a customized version of Eclipse, does it! If the include path information is missing in Eclipse, all declarations within those includes will be marked as errors in the editor. This makes it impossible to ...

Hello,

To make software development with ESP-IDF a bit more convenient, I installed Espressif IDE 4.0 and, after several failed attempts, finally configured it correctly and completely. I got problems with the "Espressif IDF Manager."

In my project, which I created using "File → New → Espressif ...

Now I have to apologize, especially to MicroController: Even though I searched through the settings several times, I missed this option!

Sorry, shit happens.

Now it works.

MicroController's suggestion

esp_sntp_config_t sntp_config = ESP_NETIF_SNTP_DEFAULT_CONFIG_MULTIPLE(
3,
ESP_SNTP_SERVER_LIST( NULL, NULL, NULL ) );


was not tested by him. The following warning appeared during code compilation:

/home/mick/Projects/ESP-IDF/eve/components/wifi/wifi.c: In ...

Unfortunately, I can't use the macro ESP_NETIF_SNTP_DEFAULT_CONFIG_MULTIPLE because my server list isn't fixed. It can contain between one and three servers.

It's no use to me to pass this macro two fixed servers just to test whether it works in general or not. In real-world operation, this list is ...

I'd like to end this discussion!

As I said, I'm perfectly happy with a sector size of 4096 bytes, and I have neither the time nor the inclination to play with all sorts of settings and code!

!!! Sorry !!!

My last post belongs to an other discussion (about the sector size of FAT partitions)!!
I used the link in the email to reply to a post, but it led me to the wrong discussion!!

!!! Sorry !!!

I'd like to end this discussion!

As I said, I'm perfectly happy with a sector size of 4096 bytes, and I have neither the time nor the inclination to play with all sorts of settings and code!

I made this setting right at the beginning, but it resulted in the creation of a partition that couldn't be mounted!

Like I said, I accept the sector size of 4096 bytes. The main thing is that it works. And it does!